One of the perks of being a Nomad is you get to
meet interesting and diverse people everywhere you go, and hear and see what they
think about current events which offer a different point of view. We may not
realize it, but we are in the midst of some huge shifts in world politics
and geo-dominance. The world is changing around us at a speed never before
seen. I like to stop sometimes and ask people from different backgrounds what
they think of things that are happening in the US and the West in general, that
impact all of us. The responses are always insightful and give food for thought,
given we in the West don’t always think through the consequences of our actions,
policies and sometimes in-action, to the rest of the world. This is both
irresponsible and dangerous given we have created a global economy that we have
been the engine to for over half a century.
This weekend I had brunch with a senior Russian
diplomat in Brussels. It was a social affair and given I didn’t ask his
permission to blog about our conversation he shall remain nameless. The discussion
was very interesting and it was a breath of fresh air to hear about how things
have evolved in Russia and the former Soviet states, as well as to learn about
the continued challenges the region and its people face. And in case you were
wondering there was no vodka involved, just good tea. But what was really
intriguing was when I asked the question ‘What
do Russians think about President Obama and his Administration?’
The first thing the diplomat did was praise
the President’s efforts in boosting the relationship between the two countries.
The second was praise even more intensely the position the President has
taken on the controversial missile defense system the previous Administration
had coveted, his wife and daughter joining in on the praise here. This last point
the diplomat said has earned the genuine respect and friendship of the Russian
people, a victory of the hearts and minds, so to speak. I’m not sure we realize
how much damage was done to the relationship with Russia under President Bush,
and perhaps we don’t care. But we should. They still have influence - militarily,
economically and geo-politically - across a third of the world, and they could
hold the key to avoiding military conflict with the likes of Iran, North Korea
and even Venezuela.
And here is an important point about the negative
feelings Russians had for our former President – none of it is personal. I’m
learning that foreigners generally don’t make it personal the way we do in our country,
especially the US media that has lost its role as an objective reporter of news. They take a very pragmatic look at Leaders and judge them by what
they say and what they do. Its that simple. The diplomat was not disrespectful
to President Bush in our conversation, nor was he a biased supporter of
President Obama. In fact, he gave credit where credit was due and was explicit
about past and current failures by US administrations. He simply conveyed the
impression both men left on the Russian people through their actions and words. They leave the judging to history.
So having concluded the sniff test on President
Obama as being generally ‘positive’, I continued to press the diplomat on other
areas and how he sees things developing over the coming months and years. Here
are some summary points from what he shared with me that I thought were very interesting
and provide some food for thought:
· A weak dollar and low US interest rates are
hurting everyone and the Administration’s current financial policy is deemed a
failure. US exports may rise given the weak dollar, but ultimately a shift to
the Euro will hurt the US, the UK and developing countries like Russia, China,
India and Brazil. A weak U.S. dollar and low U.S. interest rates have led to
"massive speculation" that was inflating asset bubbles around the
world. It has created unavoidable risks for the economic recovery, especially in
emerging economies like Russia and China. The impact on global asset prices and
encouraging speculation in stock and property markets is a serious threat to
the stability we all want to achieve;
· US spending is ironic to the Russians who see the
efforts by Congress to revive the US economy through heavy spending, stimulus
plans and increased taxes as taking a page from the communist playbook (this
was a quote, not my words) that just don’t work. Basic message here is you
can’t spend your way out of a recession and 10% unemployment, you need sound
economic policy to stimulate private enterprise. It felt strange to hear a
career Russian diplomat preach free enterprise to me;
· Generation Y is doing its thing in Russia.
Entrepreneurship, much like in the West, is just plain trendy and ‘cool’ over
there, and the government and wealthy individuals are encouraging the youth to
get out and make it happen. And they are. Russian government policy is being
adapted to support this effort and the diplomat’s view was that this push for
creating businesses and the innovation that comes with it will impact
generations to come a la Bill Gates and Richard Branson. Time will tell;
· The Diplomat had just returned from a mission to
Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. It had been 4 years since his last visit and
he described how the city had transformed itself into a very modern and clean
city worth a visit. The Azerbaijan economy is fueled by their vast gas and oil
reserves that are under development, and controlled by the State. The oil sits
so close to the surface that the oil wells they use all over the country are
fairly miniature structures compared to what we see in Russia, Saudi Arabia or
even Texas and Oklahoma, where the oil is much deeper in the ground. The diplomat
described how families have bought single oil wells and erected them in their
back yard to get in on the boom, selling their oil to brokers and making a
great living. Everywhere you go you see these single small wells that are the
height of a raised SUV, privately owned by whoever owns the land. So far the
government turns a blind eye to this ‘theft’ as the new wealth being created
has helped transform Baku and the country from the sorry state it was before;
· Taxes. Russia’s personal income tax rate is 13%
until you earn over €600,000 a year when the rate drops to 2%. Think about this
for a moment – the more you make the smaller that percentage becomes. There is
a logic to it and the Russians find the current US and UK push to increase
personal income tax once you breech a certain threshold as out of date and
disruptive to the aim of creating a better society. The UK tax rate for anyone
earning over £250,000 will jump up to 50% from 34% in April 2010, and similar
steps are happening in the US for anyone making over $250,000 a year. The
diplomat’s questions to me where: 1) who decided these thresholds? 2) what are
they based on i.e. is someone making $250,000 a year really wealthy compared to
someone make $150,000? and 3) should you not be decreasing the tax rate to
encourage investment, productivity and job creation? Needless to say I had no
good answer and was embarrassed for Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling, Nancy
Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama with whom I respectfully disagree on the
topic of taxation;
· Climate change was an interesting topic. There
was not much of a view on this the way you get in the West, but its not because
Russians are not concerned about the wellbeing of the Earth and the need for us
to all be more socially responsible, they just take a more pragmatic view that
building their economy and raising their standard of living is a much bigger
priority to driving a green agenda. At least for now.
· One thing the diplomat shared with me that was
interesting is the continued importance oil and natural gas will play in what
really goes on behind politics, the economy, and conflict around the world. He
describes climate control, healthcare and other social agenda items as smoke
screens to what is really going on behind the scenes. I came away thinking we
in the US really haven’t grasped the significance of oil on our society as fundamental
to our survival, quality of life and development. Don’t get me wrong, there
should be a move away from dependence on foreign oil and finding viable
alternative sources of energy (and I don’t mean wind, bio or solar which are
not viable yet), but somewhere we have put the cart before the horse by
suggesting that oil, gas, coal and even nuclear are all bad because they are
‘dirty’. Okay fine, they are dirty and we should find clean alternatives, but
lets not jump ship until we have another ship to jump to. The Russians get
this, why don’t we?
Overall it was a truly satisfying 3 hours of
great conversation supported by great food and great company. Of course we didn’t discuss some of the challenges Russia and the region face, especially around
freedom, law, rights and crime, so one would have to take a total look at
Russia before determining how 'on par' they are with the West. Having
said that, a recent investment report has placed Russia
ahead of Turkey and Lebanon from a risk and stability perspective. I couldn’t
help coming away feeling a bit concerned with how the Russians are playing the
Great Game with the West. I once read an Op-Ed in the Wall Street
that said the Russians are playing chess while we (Americans) are playing
monopoly. Those words eerily ring true this cold evening back in
Edinburgh.
Mr. Broumand, I liked your latest blog. I want to ask you and your readers a question. How is wealth created? The question is hardly academic in the wake of the credit crisis and ensuing global recession. As the media and politicians rail against "greed" and "free markets," it's important to know that democratic capitalism didn't fail. In fact, it's the world's greatest success story.
ReplyDeleteNo other system has improved the lives of so many. But it didn't just happen. President Reagan enacted pro-market measures, including low tax rates and less stringent regulation. This unleashed job-creating capital and a surge in innovation and prosperity.
Still, our system is in crisis and people blame free markets without knowing what this means. For example, the housing bubble never would have grown so large had the government not printed too much money. Compounding this were Fannie and Freddie, holding $1.6 trillion in low-quality paper. The government made these disasters happen, not free markets.
Where do we go from here? Free enterprise is temporarily under a cloud. But it's just that-temporary. To lift it forever we need stable money, a pro-growth tax system and free trade. The rest of the world has started to get that this is how true wealth is created. Now we have to learn it, again.
Tim