The condition for the introductions from Reverend
Moss was this: if you are successful in securing business process outsourcing
contracts with local and national government entities, then you hold a
recruitment fair at my Church and recruit people from my neighborhood. The
President of the company plans to honor this commitment and will recruit as
much talent as is available from Trinity United’s neighborhood.
Now there is nothing illegal or even slightly off
that I can see about what has transpired here between the British company,
Trinity and Senator Burris. If anything, you can applaud the company and Trinity
for being innovative, while you can say Senator Burris was simply doing what he
is supposed to do, introduce ways to improve local government. But something
doesn’t sit right with me and it won’t go away several weeks after my visit to
Chicago.
One thing I have learnt as an Executive who works
with companies all over the world is to trust my intuition, and when something
refuses to go away you have to hold on to it until it becomes clear. And it hit
the other day when I was reading the recent "upbeat" news is that the
level of unemployment has leveled off at about 10% after
its earlier climb this year. That is what we are celebrating? It fell from
10.2% to 10%, and that has people singing rebound? I don’t get it.
But then what are you going to do in today’s
climate? No one is inspiring confidence when it comes to the economy, not even
the economists. The ‘experts’ advising the administration are staying away from
the hard facts and figures that do not support what we are seeing and hearing
from the capital today. And the unemployment figures are the sharpest of these
facts and figures, indicating that the $787 billion stimulus package in
the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act and its protectionist "Buy
American" provisions remain a perpetual irritant to international trade
and investment. The warped Cash for
Clunkers program created a short bubble via a massive public
giveaway (and incidentally doing nothing to help the
environment), and is more akin to prescribing an aspirin for brain
cancer. All of these initiatives fail to inspire confidence so what is a
community leader like Reverend Moss to do?
And as if the White House is borrowing a page from
the book of the Chicago community leader, a job summit was held on December 3rd
aimed at solving the unemployment problem that is hurting America and Americans
today. Now I don’t personally have a view on the jobs summit and I purposely refuse
to jump in a political debate over this President and his performance, but as a
business executive I do know that the economy works on the same sound
principles for the past 1,000 years, and its not a job summit followed by more
government spending that is going to create them. And its not the President
saying to Business: we need more jobs. No, subsidies for these programs sop up
wealth and thus kill sensible job opportunities elsewhere.
And that is why you have a Reverend approaching a
foreign entity to leverage his political connections, hoping that would create
jobs somewhere down the road for his flock. 15.4 million unemployed, one
Reverend. It won’t work.
You can only improve labor markets by freeing them
up. Scrap the talk about ad hoc subsidies, and seriously consider deregulation.
Roll back the three recent minimum-wage increases that have blunted job
creation for low-skilled workers in a stagnant labor market. Veto any effort by
Congress to pass the Employer Free Choice Act, whose uncertain threat of
compulsory unionization has prompted many businesses to shelve any plans for
expansion. And put a halt on legislation for carbon caps and taxes until the
science gets sorted out. Don't let the EPA make a hasty endangerment finding
on carbon dioxide.
Deregulation costs nothing to administer, increases jobs and adds to the tax
base.
What has bothered me about the Chicago story is
that it just highlights our current approach to fixing the economy doesn’t
work. That’s what bothers me about that story. So what do you think about the
Reverend, the British company and the Senator? I’d love to get your thoughts.
If pro is the opposite of con what is the opposite of progress?
ReplyDeleteGood one Yvonne...'Congress'... Have you read the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence? They are worth a read. Remarkable how the founding fathers had so much wisdom. I have always thought there was one thing missing in the constitution, and that is that Congress should always hold a majority of the party that is not the same as the sitting President. If you look back in history to periods of great achievement, you almost always had opposing parties in the White House and holding the majority in Congress. Think Regan and the Democrats, or Clinton and the Republicans. What this does is force everyone to work together, work through the issues and focus on getting results, instead of politicking. Balance is needed, and I think this would ensure that the interests of the entire population would be well served if you didn't have the same party holding both White House and Congress.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment, I appreciate it!